Modernisation is not Modernism
A Srinivas Rao
Sangay Lobsang of Harvard was appointed last week as the Prime Minister of the Tibetans and more than 500 years of tradition yielded to a modern view of separation of the Church ( as represented by the Dalai Lama) from the State. Somewhere along the way, the discomfiture within Islam in our times also stems from the unitary conception of Church and State and the inability to separate the two. Of course there is no hierarchically organized church in Islam (nor is there one in Vajrayana Buddhism). Yet the principle of separating the institutions of the state fashioned on reason and church founded on faith and revelation has been inexorably continuing on a secular trajectory. All modern institutions of the state and by contagion all public institutions (except those of religion) follow this as a cardinal principle, including the separation of the domain of ethics from that of religion. Indeed the definition of modernity is often predicated on such a separation of powers; a quarantine between faith and reason. Often when as a faculty I have noticed well meaning prayer invocations in Sanskrit and celebration of religious festivals, I have felt that the school more than others must reflect on the place of religion in society and while giving it its due, keep enshrined not loyalties or traditions but reason in its prayer halls. What is the genesis of this and what are the values it assumes and makes us complicit in is what I would attempt to write.
