18 April 2023

The Evergreen Bar and Restaurant

The Dudhwala Building


 This little essay  was written for the residents and owners’ of the little building Fifty One East at Bandra and was kindled by random reflections that occurred to me when I was informed of a sacred rite of Shri Satyanarayan Puja to be performed at the entrance to our building on the auspicious occasion of Akshaya Tritiya on 22nd April 2023; a day six years ago  when my next door neighbour and I performed our housewarming rites. Subsequently many trickled in over the years performing their housewarming in their own way. I believe that these rites were meant to be not merely an auspicious beginning but an offering of the dwelling to that Indweller that He might dwell in our hearts. A corollary motive was also to placate unanticipated obstacles and purify the ground and the environs, if not evil spirits. Yet I cannot but help wonder if there was an unspoken idea born of disquiet that this site was once a pub. I have interspersed the text with a few verses from the eleventh century poet and philosopher of Persia called Omar Khayyam and his famous book of verse The Rubaiyat which has inspired generations of intelligent people settling for a quiet drink for centuries including Harivansh Rai Bachhan who followed up with Madhushala. Only a few are from the famous Fitzgerald translation while the others are not known. My quoting the text does not imply that I share his belief. Please take this as a light hearted piece and not seriously as opinions to contest or confront.




“How much more of the mosque, of prayer and fasting?
Better go drunk and begging round the taverns.
Khayyam, drink wine, for soon this clay of yours
Will make a cup, bowl, one day a jar.

When once you hear the roses are in bloom,
Then is the time, my love, to pour the wine;
Houris and palaces and Heaven and Hell-
These are but fairy-tales, forget them all.”

Among the memorable books that emerged from the flower children of the 60s is "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" by Robert Pirsig, where he ruminated on life and philosophy and at one point narrates a tale of some people who complained to a priest about a church building being converted to a pub. The sagely priest smiled and reminded them that the real church was never in the brick and mortar but in each believer in Christ who constituted the body of the church, a living organism; it was not a building but a body that is invisible. Of course Pirsig then proceeds to examine the idea of a University as a church of Reason. I am intrigued by the inversion of this metaphor of a pub or bar converted into a residence.  

 

I was persuaded to buy six years ago a flat in a building that stood on a site which once was “The Evergreen Bar and Restaurant”, a thriving and colourful bar and restaurant at the edge of a teeming slum called Shastri Nagar and belonged neither to the slum nor to the haggardly buildings that it rested against. There was barely even a footpath but a huddle of bricks next to the gutters of the slum that led nowhere wherein ambled sewer rats and bandicoots and then suddenly you chanced upon this bar and possibly was the cause of joy to some, an unburdening to others and the ruin of yet others, all who have vanished in the mists of history. I cannot say that I have been its patron though I cannot deny that there have been a couple of occasions where I freshly graduated in the early 1980s walked in with a friend; into its dark and eerily lit smoky recesses to down a pint or two or use a large rum and coke to kindle a conversation that exhausted itself in the smoke and din of friends jeering, shouting, and the tinkling and crashing of glass. With bearers running down the aisles and mingled odours of freshly spiced dishes and stale sweat and alcohol of assorted strength its ambiance assailed the senses into numbness. Once you stepped inside the bar you would forget the squalor that skirted the slum and the din of the concourse of life in huddled spaces was matched within the bar by din of a different order. This was not the species called “Family Bar and Restaurant” where families discreetly indulged a drink or two in a well lit genteel way with entrees covering up unnumbered drinks unobserved by prying eyes at ‘Gharonda’ or even ‘Chinar’ which were close by. It was worse than the ‘Ujala Bar and Restaurant’ which had a similar clientele but was cleaner. Yet it was a proud establishment that never failed to satiate the thirst of the thousands who met there.

 

“Drink wine. This is life eternal. This is all that youth will give you.

It is the season for wine, roses and drunken friends. Be happy for this moment. This moment is your life.”

This place was loud and raucous and at times was drowned by awful music of the eighties and you entered a different world where you did not know where you were, dark, dingy even menacing lit in red bulbs with cigarette smoke curling up. It was a place where your status, position, title, wealth or rank held no place and was a strange equalizer. All you knew after a pint or two was what you were animatedly talking about, your friend and his glass and the remnants of uneaten snacks and cigarette ash. Strangely I believe that was true of every bar in those days of youth and if one were taken out of one and put into another you could not tell the difference. Those were also days of scarcity and thrift was imposed by the necessity of a light purse. Mostly they were just a pretext to catch up, talking animatedly with friends on every topic under the sun including books, films, music, philosophy, poetry and indeed love, late until we were reminded to place the last orders. Life was the tint of red wine and there was just the future, a great unknown.

 

I would never have believed then that someday I might inhabit and share the same space that was once a bar with my mother in tow and even call it home and herald each dawn with Vedic chants of Rudram Chamkam or the Taittiriya or the shahasranama. Indeed I might have even thought it unaesthetic or simply sacrilegious. Yet such is the strange turn of the screw of fate that I find myself in this place that upon reflection seems crazy, exasperating and strangely home though amusingly it was once a pub! Over the last five years the place transformed to an extent that can be only described as profound as that when a frog kissed by a princess turned into a prince. The slum beneath the building’s toes vanished and the building emerged like a butterfly from a chrysalis. Of course I am exaggerating and resorting to hyperbole but nevertheless the transformation was great. I simply dismissed the place history as irrelevant to my intent and purpose of establishing a new home for my mother and me, though to many others it was a troubling idea. I was in a hurry and the others were not. It was mom’s 75th birthday and impulsively took the decision to gift her a new place without bargaining much “Alhamdulillah” as the sales staff gushed. Many were unnerved at the slum just beneath our toes and others added that the developer belonged to another faith. The sales staff at the Dudhwala building chimed that the choice of a home is not made in one’s head but by the will of the good Lord “Insha Allah”. I am not saying that dismissing this history was a rational or good judgment. I am merely stating that there are more ways that people examine this, all of which are valid and legitimate though I might disagree with some or more.

 

“The moving finger writes; and, having writ moves on:

nor all thy Piety nor Wit

Shall lure it to cancel half a line,

Nor all thy tears wash out a word of it”

 

Can a space that was once a temple or pub, have any bearing on its trajectory over time on the quality of the space? Simply put, it throws into relief the question whether space and time have any quality or are simply quality less and perfectly substitutable. Can a church that became a pub retain its sacred quality despite operating as a pub or can a pub changed into a residential building haunt its denizens of merits and errors/sins committed on its soil in the recent past. Can a site be made holy upon consecration or does it bear the burden of its history and remain lingeringly on the edges of its dual quality. I do not wish to get into the New Age wooliness of every place having vibrations and that one can sense positive or negative vibrations. I am tonally deaf to vibrations and cannot understand it and I find it exasperating when people declare that they can feel these vibrations and dismiss it to a fault of my sensibilities if not theirs. Is space neutral or is the scared and the profane inextricably commingled such as to render its quality as neutral? Literature laments the march of modernity and the loss of life’s certainties and the secularization of all public life and the loss of all symbolic life to the margins especially that of religion. But be that as it may does it really change the way people think or fear?

 

In most traditional societies like India where several layers of time sit uneasily upon each other simultaneously, the complexity of response is marked by even more uncertainty. Notions of space and time are not quality free and are not perfectly substitutable, they vary in quality like sacred/profane spaces like temple/crematoria sites or (in) auspicious time like rahu kaal, abhijit muhurta etc. In other words we fragment space and time and treat these fragments differently, their contradictions notwithstanding. When called upon to make a stark choice like buying property on the site of a pub, a crematorium, or a place of worship of a minority group (or even developed by someone of a different religion) we would be seized of non rational concerns and fears. We make rational economic choices and then rationalize these choices and appoint priests to negotiate with the Gods their placating, appeasement, or even silencing the voices of the past, be they spirits, residual karma or bad “vibrations”.

 

“Why ponder thus the future to foresee, and jade thy brain to vain perplexity? Cast off thy care, leave Allah’s plans to him – He formed them all without consulting thee.” Three Cups of Tea”

 

Some of my neighbours brought in priests from a distant pilgrim place, some performed rites over three full days, and some like my mother urged the priest to get on with the job quickly enough to attend to other cares. My own ritual advisor an elderly Malayali took over personally the task of Shuddhi and Shanti (purification and placation) more seriously than we imagined and brought a Malayali priest from Panvel notably three hours late on Akshaya Tritiya 2017 who then went on to draw diagrams of the Vastu Purusha for worship and over the next three hours ignored my mother’s urging to conclude soon. I remember that at one stage I was advised to place silver images of the heads of five animals within the walls and plaster it up, which I refused, reminded as I was of the nature of violence whether performed in the head as thought or physically as the body in the symbolic sacrifice of animals. I do not state this with any intent to denigrate these beliefs or show them in a poor light. On the contrary I enjoy observing these rites as a participant observer reflecting upon these things at leisure. We cope with uncertainty and allay our fears by practicing rites that would sacralise the secular and secularize the sacred. This is a perfectly valid and legitimate way to deal with our (un)conscious fears and concerns or even of making conscious statements for political or even commercial purposes. I am not sure I am a liberal though I tend more towards that, I think of myself as conservative and do cherish traditions and institutions and religious practice in private and read antiquated texts and for all appearances seem a yokel of the rural hinterland (not that I care).

 

About four years ago when there was an unfortunate and untimely death among the newly resident members in the building there was a palpable whisper that we ought to do some religious rites for Shanti (make peace or appease any lurking evil spirits that were yet possibly hung over from the erstwhile Evergreen bar) by doing a Satyanarayana Puja. I had then very unwisely remarked that prior to the death there was the birth of a baby boy in the building which had heralded auspicious tidings and that death alternating birth was the natural order and refused to take initiative. I must however confess that it also troubled me that the CHS is a secular institution and liberty of faith and its practice must be equally and not perfunctorily rendered, though it never troubled the majority. What I had not understood then was that fear more than joy grips our imagination and prompts us a course of action, regardless of the faith we followed. That error is now probably being remedied by the planned worship this weekend, notwithstanding the fact that life is a march of strife punctuated occasionally with vanishing rays of joy. It is strife that prompts our worship more than events of joy or those of thanksgiving.

 

Oh threats of Hell and Hopes of Paradise!
One thing at least is certain - This Life flies;
One thing is certain and the rest is Lies -
The Flower that once has blown forever dies.”


As for the nature of the cooperative housing society (CHS) as a secular institution, I don’t think the question is taken seriously and it need not be, being edged out by our diurnal concerns. I have no problems with the unwashed labeling me a ‘sickular’ or ‘pseudo’ or anything that tickles their imagination. I don’t even think it is a serious enough question when more urgent conformance to rules plague the place. It is not that I am obsessed with a formalism of conformance to rules but just that it places everyone on an equal footing in the observance of being subordinate to a set of laws and rules. I am always reminded the wise counsel of my boss Dr M L Shrikant who told me “Srinivas these are the rules. All rules can be broken. Knowing which ones to break and when demands wisdom and responsibility and an understanding among all who are affected, why you are doing so”.

A cooperative society is not an organization but an organism, "a fragile ecosystem, a combustible mixture of impossible people, ideas, and intentions" to borrow the words of a wise black pastor at Harvard in describing a school. It is founded on the collocation of its residents “are endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. It is made up of strange factions that constantly shift boundaries in redefining the “Us” as distinct if not against “Them” based on shared tongue, culture, region, dietary habits, social and economic standing, or any other basis sometimes bordering on the pretentious. Every institution has a dual nature one of ‘Form’ and the other “Spirit’. The Bengali tradition holds the sacred feminine, the Devi (or any institution, even nation) in her dual aspect as mrunmayee as “form” or image and chinmayee as an “idea” or spirit. So also at the heart of the CHS is the physical building and its custody and the idea of co-operation and a commitment to share the travail of having to live together responsibly regardless of our prejudice and preference. The rest is merely noise in the pub.  My mother given her advanced age is often asked her blessings and one of her pronouncements in Telugu is “challaga, pachhaga undali” may you be at peace and evergreen!

 

“Ah, make the most of what we yet may spend,
Before we too into the Dust descend;
Dust into Dust, and under Dust to lie
Sans Wine, sans Song, sans Singer, and--sans End!

Alike for those who for To-day prepare,
And those that after some To-morrow stare,
A Muezzin from the Tower of Darkness cries
"Fools! your Reward is neither Here nor There.”
― Omar Khayyam, رباعيات خيام

 Post Script:

The rite was indefinitely postponed which is euphemism for cancellation for reasons which were more to do with scale than piety. The people who championed it fell into two camps the pietists who wanted a simple ceremony without any frills and the populists who wanted a jamboree with the worship merely a pretext for a party with all accompaniments. For a society which is running on a deficit budget and with more than 50 % owners as non residents it seemed rich. I wonder if this essay provoked any rethink which is most likely impossible given that it would mean a considerable effort to read and discuss and decide; too tedious a task. 

I have been intrigued by the Sri Satyanarayana vrata which in most Andhra households is commonly performed for any special occasions like housewarming rites. The putative origins of the vrata come from the Skanda Purana which is a large purana of over 70,000 verses and seems to have grown by accretions and interpolations over the centuries. The origins of the vrata also seem to come from Bengal and seems to overlap a syncretic tradition that refers to both a Hindu and an Islamic origin. The Islamic tradition is the worship pf Satya Pir (Shoccho Pir) and possibly commences around the 16th Century CE. It is difficult to trace which tradition influenced the other and an account of the Satya Pir Kavya dates according to some scholars 1545-1575 CE by Sheikh Faizullah. The worship is done in Bengal of a wooden plank (asana) which is vacant representing the deity or Pir which as it migrates towards Western India is replaced by a sacred pot (kalash that itself evolved as an ancient fertility symbol). The pictorial Vishnu arising from the worship as shown in calendar art is a twentieth century development. The worship is done of simple materials such that it is accessible to all classes and its officiating priest is not a brahmin. Further this puja is not done on an Ekadashi or Chatruthi in Maharashtra (which is strange if Vishnu is the presiding deity) but in Eastern India on the Full Moon day. There are no temples of Satyanarayana anywhere except one at Annavaram in Andhra Pradesh though it seems not an ancient one and was established  in 1891. The iconography of the Annavaram principal deities is also unusual with the ground floor devoted to the five forms or Panchayatana (Ganesha, Surya, Narayana, Shakti and Shiva) worship around the Tripad Vibhuti Yantra and the first floor housing the principal deity which seems like an amalgamation of Shaiva, Vaishnava and Shakta deities. The central Satyanarayana deva seems more of a linga aakara and is thus intriguing as it doesn't follow orthodox iconography. There is however a Satya Pir shrine in Odisha at Kaipadhar near Khordha whose present shrine dates back to 1893. It is likely that the deity is syncretic in origin as not many Vaishnava traditions (Ramanuja, Madhwa, Vallabhi, Ramanandi, Nimbarki or Gaudiya) hold it with any significance. It is a deity for the masses seeking succor to the travails of life and heedless to antiquity of tradition, scriptural sanction or social hierarchy and with no shrine or pilgrimage either. The syncretism and additions to the Hindu traditions is an ongoing process and is possibly responsive to the demands of faith according to the times. Given its unorthodox history the worship would have been welcome to our times. Possibly The rite will be conducted some day hopefully. 

A Srinivas Rao

701 Fifty One East