A Srinivas Rao
I was surprised when someone I know was wishing others the national day of his adopted country, a state which is also unfairly sometimes called a ‘nanny state’. It was not the incongruity but the intriguing idea of solidarity and loyalties (however divided) to the lands of our adoption. The lands in question are not merely those of geography but mental worlds. “We Are All Palestinians” was the emblazoned lettering on the Tee shirt that one day flashed across the street, provoking me to wonder whether that was true. Palestine to the author of this shirt sleeve slogan was more than a nation without a state. Palestine is a ‘state’ of exile. Maybe we are all Diaspora, exiled in varied ways from what we imagine as ‘home’. In other words, is ‘home’ an imagining of a golden childhood, inaccessible except through longing, a nostalgic hankering for the “holy grail”? Just like the saccharine refrain of Dwijendralal Roy’s song “Amar Janmobhoomi” a mere fictitious idyll. Are our loyalties really divided between our native lands and the places of our adoption (and our freshly minted citizenships markers to a yearned difference in our self identities and descriptions and demonstrated by declamations of loyalties)?
Is exile inevitable, circumstantial or otherwise; what we metaphorically suffer regardless of living in the place of our birth? I am reminded of my first visit to England, especially London more than a decade ago. I had imagined an England much in advance of even visiting it by adopting the colonial master’s tongue as a child and had shaped the world around me in its own English image. The world they say is linguistically constituted; nay language is the world. More provocatively, is language our real homeland? My imagination was fired by the fact that Baker street, Bond street, Elizabeth Barret Browning, Trafalgar Square, Bard of Avon, Charring Cross, Henry VIII, Piccadilly, Bunbury, Winston Churchill, Westminster, Rosetta, Canterbury, Thomas Beckett, Thomas Moore, Queen of Scots, Stone of Scone; all proper nouns, carefully capitalised in my mind were all real. Images of places people and things, however inchoate that had populated my mind since childhood, over English breakfasts (however notoriously insipid) and teas and buttered scones, and a lush countryside, were real imaginings, sometime somewhere as much as pixies and elves, gnomes, goblins and golliwogs. I shed real tears at the graves of poets of yore at Westminster Abbey remembering their song and longing. It was an imagination shaped not so much by Kalidasa, Bana or Panini or Bhartrihari or Abhinavagupta but by Enid Blyton, Conan Doyle and Agatha Christies, or perhaps Dickens, Bronte and Hardy or Shelly, Keats and Wordsworth. Yet I felt an alien in that familiar land where each person looked at me with an indifferent or perhaps an odd if not a derisive eye. I possibly feared the place despite its familiarity as it unsettled me, as I did not belong there though I belonged to it. I knew I was not one among them sharing the fruits of a debatable civilization that Macualay so laboriously and notoriously conferred upon me a colonial subject long after independence from a foreign yoke.
Does that condemn me to being in a state of perpetual exile; un-belonging to either shore, yet seeking harbour for a tried brow? A child of a mixed parentage of different cultures; uneasily unsettled in the interstices. A Diaspora of the mind; though not in geography. Neither do I envy those with a great grounding in a vernacular tongue such as Bengali, Tamil; apart from English as neither have they negotiated the chasm with any comfort, preferring to keep the ‘Two Cultures’ sanitarily separate and purposively expedient. Probably as another Tee shirt claimed “My Roots Lie in the Soil of Palestine” which is really shorthand for being in exile! Who knows what harbour it is to unburden ourselves through belonging. Some of us though will remain exiled by language.
No comments:
Post a Comment